Capital and equality
Just recently I read an article by a well respected commentator who said that basically the only way to regain equality in capitalist states is to have a war. Thanks to my shoddy memory, I cannot for the life of me remember who that was, but the comment really hit home.
Thomas Picketty, the French economist who wrote "Capitalism in the 21st Century" alluded to the same phenomenon: wars reset the economic playing field.
So here we are well into the 21st century and is seems that the wealth of nations is being siphoned up to the rich faster and faster, with the collusion of governments. One can look at various articles and reports about the vast inequality of wealth in most developed and developing countries, and a similar picture emerges. The top 10% owen 90% of everything. It's like the end game of a global monopoly contest.
Now, here in benighted Oz, we have the current "conservative" government pushing for more tax breaks for the corporations and the wealthy at the expense of the poor, who are being punished for their condition more and more. And this, folks, is normal behaviour from those who have.
Recent studies in the United States, particularly after the massive tax break the Rethuglicans gave to their supporters, indicate that despite the rhetoric about investment into infrastructure and new jobs, most of the tax break dollars went into dividends for the shareholders and stock buy-backs.
Here in Oz we have had a similar pledge by our corporate moguls that in order to keep competitive, they need to be taxed less, and funds would be available for more capital investment into infrastructure and jobs. Guess what? Nada.
The neo-conservatives, neo-liberals, economic rationalists of this world/nation are still at it even though, according to commentators like Guy Rundle and Bernard Keane of Crikey, it's all a sham. New-liberalism is "...a rotting corpse" polluting the body politic.
So it seems we have a bit of a challenge if we really want to get a more level playing field: do we do it by taxation, or do we do it by war?
Taxation is the safer option. War, in this time, is unthinkable. But considering the old aphorism: "nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the public" may have it right.
It's the great dog whistle. "Look over there", where there is racism, terrorism, overall bigotry and human stupidity, against the ever present spectre of rampant greed sucking up all the goods. One thing about the conservatives, they really know how to do this well. Rustle up the hate so they can continue to earn big bucks.
But it may, just may, come back to haunt them.
Here's a poem I wrote about this:
Thomas Picketty, the French economist who wrote "Capitalism in the 21st Century" alluded to the same phenomenon: wars reset the economic playing field.
So here we are well into the 21st century and is seems that the wealth of nations is being siphoned up to the rich faster and faster, with the collusion of governments. One can look at various articles and reports about the vast inequality of wealth in most developed and developing countries, and a similar picture emerges. The top 10% owen 90% of everything. It's like the end game of a global monopoly contest.
Now, here in benighted Oz, we have the current "conservative" government pushing for more tax breaks for the corporations and the wealthy at the expense of the poor, who are being punished for their condition more and more. And this, folks, is normal behaviour from those who have.
Recent studies in the United States, particularly after the massive tax break the Rethuglicans gave to their supporters, indicate that despite the rhetoric about investment into infrastructure and new jobs, most of the tax break dollars went into dividends for the shareholders and stock buy-backs.
Here in Oz we have had a similar pledge by our corporate moguls that in order to keep competitive, they need to be taxed less, and funds would be available for more capital investment into infrastructure and jobs. Guess what? Nada.
The neo-conservatives, neo-liberals, economic rationalists of this world/nation are still at it even though, according to commentators like Guy Rundle and Bernard Keane of Crikey, it's all a sham. New-liberalism is "...a rotting corpse" polluting the body politic.
So it seems we have a bit of a challenge if we really want to get a more level playing field: do we do it by taxation, or do we do it by war?
Taxation is the safer option. War, in this time, is unthinkable. But considering the old aphorism: "nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the public" may have it right.
It's the great dog whistle. "Look over there", where there is racism, terrorism, overall bigotry and human stupidity, against the ever present spectre of rampant greed sucking up all the goods. One thing about the conservatives, they really know how to do this well. Rustle up the hate so they can continue to earn big bucks.
But it may, just may, come back to haunt them.
Here's a poem I wrote about this:
So, does a
business ledger have a soul?
And does a massive
profit make us whole?
Or, does a loss
then make us even less
Than who we
are? Ah, I can only guess,
For values in our
land are based on gold.
We humans are
worth less – or so we’re told –
Than what in life
we manage to obtain;
The merit in our
lives is based on gain.
Now Greed – once
vice – is held a worthy aim,
No matter that
we’re called to kill and maim
To win a war and
take the widow’s mite.
And starving
millions hidden from our sight
Bear witness to
our arrogance and pride:
From Nemesis to
come we cannot hide.
And to finish off this rant, here's the latest from our cartoonist-laureate: Michael Leunig.
'till next time, folks.